New Delhi: Congress chief Rahul Gandhi suffered a authorized setback Friday because the Gujarat Excessive Courtroom dismissed his plea towards his conviction in a prison defamation case over a “Modi surname” comment.
Gandhi was sued and acquired a two-year sentence this March for a pre-poll remark in 2019 whereby he had requested at a rally if all these with the Modi surname have been thieves.
Gandhi, due to this fact, will stay disqualified from the Lok Sabha, however is not going to go to jail as his sentence has been placed on maintain by a decrease court docket.
The Congress chief now has the choice of shifting the Supreme Courtroom for a keep on his conviction.
Within the Gujarat Excessive Courtroom in April, Gandhi’s counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi had argued that two years in jail for a “bailable, non-cognisable offence” meant the chief would lose his Lok Sabha seat “completely and irreversibly”. Singhvi mentioned this is able to have a “very critical further irreversible consequence to the individual and the constituency he represents”.
In line with a 2013 Supreme Courtroom ruling, an MP stands disqualified if they’re sentenced to 2 years or extra in jail.
The 52-year-old was convicted and sentenced to 2 years by a Justice of the Peace’s court docket in Gujarat on 23 March for feedback he made throughout the 2019 Lok Sabha marketing campaign.
BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi filed a case after Rahul Gandhi mentioned on the Kolar rally: “Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi… how come all of them have Modi as widespread surname? How come all of the thieves have the widespread surname Modi?”
The Congress chief, who was the Lok Sabha MP from Wayanad in Kerala, was disqualified the very subsequent day of his conviction.
He challenged the order in a periods court docket in Surat, together with an software looking for a keep on the conviction.
The Surat court docket granted him bail on 20 April until the pendency of the case however refused to remain the conviction. Gandhi moved the excessive court docket 5 days later.
On Friday, Excessive Courtroom Justice Hemant Prachchak noticed that Gandhi was looking for a keep on completely “non-existential grounds”. “Keep on conviction just isn’t a rule. As many as 10 instances are pending towards (Gandhi). It’s wanted to have purity in politics… A grievance has been filed towards (Gandhi) by the grandson of Veer Savarkar in a Pune court docket after Gandhi used phrases towards Veer Savarkar in Cambridge… Refusal to remain conviction wouldn’t in any means end in injustice to the applicant. There aren’t any affordable grounds to remain conviction. The conviction is simply, correct and authorized,” the decide added.
Additionally learn: Rahul targets KCR at Khammam rally, cites daughter Kavitha’s ‘involvement’ in Delhi liquor rip-off case